If asked to define a “catastrophic injury,” you might think such an incident to be something that severely impairs one to the point of them remaining either comatose, immobilized or dependent on round-the-clock care for the rest of their lives. Yet you may have a loved one suffer a catastrophic injury and appear to return to their pre-accident physical form. That does not necessarily mean, however, that they are not in need of continued assistance.
This is especially true if they suffer a traumatic brain injury, as such injuries are often accompanied by a cognitive impairment. To comprehend the assistance your loved one might need in dealing with such an issue, you first need to understand how important cognition is to daily functions.
Per the Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center , cognition includes the following:
While many might refer to these things as being “skills,” they are basic necessities when it comes to retaining a job, forming lasting relationships and even managing the tasks of day-to-day living.
Cognitive impairments are commonly associated with TBIs. Thus, while your loved one might appear to have “recovered,” they still may have difficulty in resuming their lives. Additional assistance such as counseling or vocational rehab might help in overcoming this issue, yet these benefits can be costly. Covering these costs is often the sole reason why one might consider seeking compensation immediately following a catastrophic accident.
If you've been injured due to the negligence of others, don't hesitate to reach out to Sarkisian Law Offices. Our team is ready to provide you with a free consultation to discuss the details of your case and outline the legal options available to you.
Remember, you don't have to navigate this alone. Sarkisian Law Offices is here to fight for your rights and help you rebuild your life after a personal injury.
We have been handling personal injury cases in Indiana for over 40 years and are committed to getting the best possible outcome for our clients.
* Past results are not an express or implied prediction of future success, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. (Ind. Prof. Cond. R. 7.1).
All Rights Reserved | Sarkisian Law Offices | Video Production by Initium Creative | Privacy Policy