3 problems with signing a blanket medical authorization after an injury

March 18, 2021

 

 
To make money, insurance companies often must pay as little as possible for injury claims. As a result, you can expect an insurer to use many tactics to deny your claim or delay its processing. These tactics may also contribute to a low settlement offer.

 

 

Asking injured individuals to sign a blanket medical authorization is common among insurers. Because this authorization gives the insurance company access to all your medical records, there may be three problems with signing one.

 

1. You surrender your privacy

 

 
When you see a medical provider, it may be necessary to discuss embarrassing or intimate details. Your medical records also probably include information about the illnesses you have or have had, the medications you take and the lifestyle you live. If you sign a blanket medical authorization,
your private medical details are no longer private.

 

 

 

2. Your insurer sees everything

You probably should not assume your insurer will only look at the medical records that have some relation to your injury claim. After all, because a blanket medical authorization entitles insurance adjusters to see everything, they are likely to look for pre-existing conditions or other reasons to deny your claim or offer you less than you deserve.

3. You cannot un-ring the bell

The insurer is likely to move quickly to access your medical records after you sign a blanket authorization. Even if you change your mind after executing the document, it may be difficult to contain the fallout.

While there are legitimate reasons to allow insurers to examine your medical records, you do not want to do more harm than good. Consequently, before signing anything after an injury, it is critical to understand the consequences of your actions.

Trying to figure out bills after no longer working from accident
By Sarkisian Law Offices • October 6, 2026
If a crash ended your career, Indiana law allows recovery for lost earning capacity. How those claims are calculated, proven, and contested.
Gray child car seat secured on a black car back seat, facing sideways in the rear passenger area.
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 29, 2026
Children are injured differently than adults in crashes. Pediatric injury patterns, Indiana car seat law, and why early settlements carry real risk.
Semi-truck traveling on a Northwest Indiana interstate highway
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 22, 2026
A truck crash rarely has one liable party. Learn when an Indiana trucking company is responsible, from negligent hiring to hours-of-service violations.
Attorney reviewing a contract with a client across a desk in a law office
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 15, 2026
What to ask in a free consultation with an Indiana injury lawyer, from contingency fees and case costs to comparative fault and filing deadlines.
Two cars after a rear-end collision on a Northwest Indiana road
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 8, 2026
Is the rear driver always at fault in an Indiana rear-end crash? Not always. Learn how comparative fault, brake-checking, and evidence decide who pays.
Front wheel of a black motorcycle parked on a sunlit paved street
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 3, 2026
Indiana insurers assume riders were reckless before reviewing evidence. See how that bias cuts settlements and what evidence pushes back.
Show More